Clearing the Air on A4 Emissions: A Guide for Timber Construction
In assessing the carbon footprint of building projects, emissions from transporting materials from factories to construction sites are often overlooked. Module A4 in a lifecycle assessment addresses these shipping emissions.
Though Module A4 may seem minor, for materials with low production emissions, it can represent a significant share of upfront carbon—especially for materials like cross-laminated timber (CLT) that often travel long distances.
For materials with high production emissions (A1-A3), decarbonisation efforts are likely to target these phases, making A4 transport emissions increasingly significant due to limited decarbonisation options in large-scale transport.
This article is not just about why A4 matters; it’s a practical tool for making smarter material choices early on with accurate data. Using CLT as an example, project-specific assessments allow us to refine A4 estimates to reflect the true carbon impact.
Current Assessment Methods
There are two methods we can use to understand and assess the carbon emissions associated with transport which are briefly described below.
Energy Based
It calculates average emissions for a fleet and an average A4 emission per material delivered, using fuel consumption and government-issued emissions. However, tracking fuel use in material transport is challenging.
Activity Based
This widely-used, simpler method, adopted by IStructE and Timber Development UK (TDUK), estimates a trip's carbon footprint based on distance and average vehicle emissions.
What figures are we using for CLT?
To understand the journey and related environmental impact of CLT we need to look beyond the sawmill. The IStructE's Structural Carbon Tool gives us an insight into the travel-related carbon cost; it calculates an emission value of 0.161 kgCO2e for each kilogram of timber product carried over 1500 kilometres.
TDUK recently published their ‘2024 Embodied Carbon Data for Timber Products’ that highlighted the emission factors for importing CLT. This value, originally published in kgCO2e/m3 but converted using 480kg/m3 for CLT, has a value of 0.173 kgCO2e/kg. This accounts for both sea and road travel from Europe, including a 20% addition to the figure to account for unladen lorry journeys once the CLT has been delivered at the port.
Our Research
To better understand the specifics in CLT transport, we engaged with the industry and collected data on many of the factors that impact on the A4 emissions.
How does timber travel?
Most CLT is transported to the UK from mainland Europe by articulated lorries (>33 tonnes), though the lorry's load capacity often exceeds the volume of timber carried, resulting in an average 76% load.
Timber transport involves road and sea routes. Most CLT reaches the Port of Rotterdam by road, then a roll-on roll-off ferry transports it to a UK port for final delivery to construction sites.
Our research on typical transport modes, vehicle load, and distances has led to a recommended carbon factor of 0.119 kgCO2e/kg—26% lower than the IStructE standard by accounting for actual load levels.
Although these figures are related to UK Timber use, the concepts remain the same for mainland Europe, with the use of articulated lorries and roll-on roll-off ferries to reach its desired destination.
To get an accurate freighting profile, let's break it down:
For road trips:
· Articulated lorries (capacity for more than 33 tonnes) journey around 1100 km from the timber mill to the European port.
· The last leg from UK ports to construction sites is a shorter 200 km sprint.
· Lorries, on returning, travel lighter by around 50 km to the next commission
For sea voyages:
· Roll-on roll-off ferries cover about 350 kilometres between European and UK ports.
Conclusion
When assessing total emissions for materials from production to on-site delivery (A1-A5), it’s essential to look beyond production (A1-A3) for a complete view, particularly in early design stages.
Using this research for cross-laminated timber, the IStructE carbon calculator's standard delivery stage (A4) emissions can be lowered by 26%, resulting in a 10% reduction in combined A1-A5 emissions. As the construction industry works to cut production emissions (via low-emission steel, carbon capture, cement alternatives, etc.), accurately measuring transport emissions will be vital for full embodied carbon assessments. This calls for greater data collection and knowledge sharing across the supply chain to better understand carbon sources.
The authors would like to acknowledge the contributions from B&K Structures, Hybrid Structures, KLH UK and StoraEnso without which this article would not be possible.
This article has been adapted from the original publication by the Institution of Structural Engineers (IStructE). Link: https://www.istructe.org/journal/volumes/volume-102-(2024)/issue-9/viewpoint-calculating-a4-emissions-for-mass-timber/
Authors:
Alan Dowdall - Director, Ramboll
Jonathan Skinner - Associate, Ramboll
James Morton - Structural Engineer, Ramboll